Evaluation is an Everyday Activity

Syndicate content
Program Evaluation Discussions
Updated: 3 hours 47 min ago

Story

Mon, 01/25/2016 - 3:25pm

Alan Rickman  died this month. He was an actor of my generation; one that provided me with much entertainment. I am sad. Then I saw this quote on the power of stories. How stories explain. How stories can educate. How stories can help reduce bias.  And I am reminded how stories are evaluative.

Dick Krueger did a professional development session (then called a “pre-session”) many years ago. It seems relevant now. Of course, I couldn’t find my notes (which were significant) so I did an online search, using “Dick Krueger and stories” as my search terms. I was successful! (See link.) When I went to the link, he had a whole section on story and story telling. What I remember most about that session is what he has listed under “How to Analyze the Story”. Specifically the four points he lists under problems with credibility:

  • Authenticity – Truth
  • Accuracy – Memory Problems
  • Representativeness and Sampling
  • Generalizability / Transferability

The next time you tell a story think of it in evaluative terms. And check out what Dick Krueger has to say.

I’ve started aggregating my blog posts (no easy task, to be sure) in preparation for developing the “modules” for a WECT-like approach to evaluation. The first section is Program Planning and Logic Modeling. The following posts are relevant (and presented in no particular order):

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/11/09/relevant-resources/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2010/01/05/101/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/04/19/timely-topic-planning-your-evaluation/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2012/05/30/perpetual-beta/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/10/12/stories-as-evaluation/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/04/01/how-do-you-find-the-answer/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/03/25/language-what-does-it-really-mean-and-how-do-you-know/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/03/02/all-of-the-people-all-of-the-time/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2011/01/27/standard-evaluation-tools/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2015/02/04/logic-models-good-tool/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2012/03/09/causal-relationships-evaluation-and-logic-models/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2012/01/23/logic-models-again/

http://blogs.oregonstate.edu/programevaluation/2010/12/21/logic-model-revisited/

There may be more that are remotely related to Program Planning and Logic Modeling. This was my first pass. The URLs work and will take you to a longer post. You may have to cut and paste.

my .

molly.

 

 

 

The post Story appeared first on Evaluation is an Everyday Activity.

Categories: OSU Extension Blogs

Intentions

Thu, 01/14/2016 - 12:42pm

Recently, I read that 45% of individuals make New Year’s Resolutions and only 8% actually achieve success. Hmmm…not a friendly probability. Perhaps intentions about behavior are indeed more realistic. (Haven’t seen the statistics on that potential change. Mazanian (et al, 1998) does say stated intention to change is the most significant behavioral indicator.) My intention for 2016 is to provide content related to or about evaluation that provides you with something you didn’t have before you read the post (Point one). Examples follow:

David Fetterman said in another blog , “context matters in how we interpret behavior.” Yesterday, in a faculty meeting, we were asked to identify the “isms” inherent in the various sayings. We were given a group of sayings. One saying  in that group was, “I’m just a person”. This saying is a good example of what Fetterman was saying. An individual is NOT “just” a “person”. An individual is defined by the context and the behavior conducted. I am an evaluator; I am a single mom by choice; I am a long time academic. How I behave depends on all of those and more. Saying I am “just” a “person” negates all that I am and do. Evaluation is the same way. Although the field has been advanced by the “western” world, many (most?) of those cultural characteristics of the field need to be translated to fit the context.

 

New topic: I have been blogging on evaluation now for over 6 years, since early December 2009. In that time I’ve tried to post weekly (barring holidays, conferences, you know, within reason). I’ve accumulated many posts that can be categorized into the four main parts of evaluation as I see it:

  1. Program Planning and Logic Modeling;
  2. Program Implementation, Monitoring, and Delivery;
  3. Data Management and Analysis (divided into Qualitative and Quantitative data); and
  4. Program Evaluation Utilization.

My intention in 2016 (Point two) is to organize the blog posts into those four topics and replicate a WECT program (say “west”) on-line, at least nominally. It won’t be an “on-line course” as most of you know it. It will be an access point for you who are interested in Evaluation. It will list the resources that I’ve listed in the posts; it will send you to other places for additional information. It will organize for you what I’ve written. Granted, not all the posts will be included; you can always access the blog through “Evaluation is an Everyday Activity“. Whether this will be in the blog or a separate on line posting hasn’t been decided;  I will let you know.

Let me know what you think about making a WECT-type  activity.

my .

molly.

The post Intentions appeared first on Evaluation is an Everyday Activity.

Categories: OSU Extension Blogs