OSU HOME | EXTENSION HOME | ONLINE CATALOG | ORDERING INFORMATION Extension Service
A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication
Oregon State University, Washington State University, University of IdahoCurly Dock and Broadleaf Dock
Rumex crispus L. and R. obtusifolius L.
PNW 398
January 1992
L.C. Burrill
Do you want to print a copy?
We recommend downloading the print version (112 K).
First download the free Adobe Reader, if you don't already have it.
Curly dock (Rumex crispus L.) is a perennial with a deep taproot without creeping roots or rhizomes (figure 1). Leaves are oblong to nearly lance-shaped, often 12 inches or more long, with wavy (crisped) margins (figure 2). In spring, erect, generally unbranched stems up to 5 feet tall are produced to flower in summer.
Figure 1.--Curly dock is a common perennial plant in wet soil.
Flowers are small, green, and crowded in long clusters. At maturity, flowers become brown and remain conspicuous through the winter. Individual fruits are enclosed in veiny winglike structures with smooth edges.
Figure 2.--Leaves of broadleaf dock are more oval-shaped than leaves of curly dock, which is more common in the Pacific Northwest.
Curly dock, a native of Europe, is widespread and well recognized in this region. It's well suited to moist soils. As with most simple perennials, curly dock is rarely a problem in cropland that receives annual tillage.
Broadleaf dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) is similar to curly dock, but it differs in having generally larger, broader leaves, and one to three pointed teeth on the wing of the structure enclosing the fruit (calyx); see figure 3. In distribution, it's more or less restricted to pastures and fields west of the Cascades, primarily in coastal counties.
Broadleaf dock was introduced from Eurasia.
Figure 3.--The calyx enclosing the fruit of broadleaf dock (above) has 3 pointed teeth, in contrast to the smooth edges of the calyx of curly dock (below). CONTROL
MECHANICAL. Docks can be controlled in areas commonly used for perennial crops or pastures by shifting to annual crops that require or accommodate tillage. Seeds of both docks remain viable in the soil for several years, so a 1-year rotation will provide little control.
For sparse infestations, using a shovel to remove the crown about 2 inches below the soil surface is a simple and effective control. Mowing will prevent seed production and reduce top-growth of dock to allow more complete grazing of forage species, but it won't control dock.
BIOLOGICAL. The docks aren't readily eaten by domestic livestock, which means that intensive grazing serves only to reduce competition to the dock. There are no insects or disease organisms available for use on dock.
Because these weeds are closely related to some economic crops such as rhubarb and buckwheat, control agents would have to be highly host-specific.
CHEMICAL. In noncrop areas or in grass crops, there are several herbicides that will selectively control the docks. Selective control in broadleaf crops or in pastures containing clovers is more difficult.
Limited experience with selective applications of glyphosate in a weed wiper was partially effective, but this practice requires that the dock be allowed to grow taller than the crop.
Herbicide registrations change frequently; therefore, this publication doesn't contain specific herbicide uses. Registered uses are summarized each year in the Pacific Northwest Weed Control Handbook.
In addition, detailed instructions for herbicide use are provided on herbicide container labels and in other literature provided by herbicide manufacturers.
Use pesticides safely!
- Wear protective clothing and safety devices as recommended on the label.
- Bathe or shower after each use.
- Read the pesticide label--even if you've used the pesticide before.
- Follow closely the instructions on the label (and any other directions you have).
- Be cautious when you apply pesticides.
- Know your legal responsibility as a pesticide applicator. You may be liable for injury or damage resulting from pesticide use.
Prepared by Larry C. Burrill, Extension weed scientist, Oregon State University.
Figures 1 and 2 are by the author. Figure 3: Both drawings are reproduced, with permission, from La Rea J. Dennis, Gilkey's Weeds of the Pacific Northwest (Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, 1980); © 1980 by La Rea J. Dennis.
January 1992.
Published and distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914, by the Oregon State University Extension Service, Washington State University Extension, University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
The three participating Extension Services offer educational programs, activities, and materials--without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, age, marital status, disability, and disabled veteran or Vietnam-era veteran status--as required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Oregon State University Extension Service, Washington State University Extension, and University of Idaho Extension are Equal Opportunity Employers.
Copyright © 1995- Oregon State University. Disclaimer.