Research
We apply our research findings to enhancing the program and providing educator resources.
Deborah Good is the Outdoor School Program's Research, Evaluation and Assessment Coordinator. Feel free to contact Deborah should you have any questions or suggestions regarding current research or evaluation.
Publications
Current research
Currently, in our Oregon case study on cultural responsiveness in outdoor education, we explore the motivation to engage with the suite of self-evaluation tools. We use workshop, interview and focus group data to explore the continuum of engagement with the tools.
How we approach research
All scholarly research endeavors are informed by particular research paradigms, and those inform the methodology and the methods used to collect data.1 As we consider research questions within the outdoor education setting, we consider from where our questions originate so that we may remain accountable to the communities and contexts for which we work.2
A research paradigm can also be referred to as a particular philosophical stance3 or as a conceptual framework.4 It can also be described as a ‘worldview,’ a set of metaphysical beliefs, assumptions, concepts and values that informs the researcher’s view of reality, what counts as knowledge and ways of knowing and guides research priorities, choices and actions.5
The OSU Extension Service Outdoor School program, when considering new research related to outdoor school, asks:
- Whose knowledge is given value?
We consider how context matters, and the ways in which ‘research’ has been implicated in settler-colonial relationships with land and Indigenous peoples. We consider the cultural, historical, political, environmental and legislative power structures that all play a role in research.
We make our outputs in formats that have value for our different audiences.
In considering the role of research, we navigated the complexity of our unique positionalities and epistemological and ontological stances, understanding that our stakeholders need more complex and nuanced data. We attempt to be thoughtful about our research, evaluation and assessment, making sure our outputs are in formats that have value for our different audiences. We use our power and positionality to include knowledge that has sometimes been excluded, othered or marginalized.
See related evaluation
We also report on student evaluation outcomes, fiscal data, performance indicators and equity, diversity, accessibility and inclusion data – which we share through interactive tools and summary resources.